Mimesis Law
11 August 2020

Florida’s Nonexistent Pot Halloween Candy Scare

November 1, 2016 (Fault Lines) — Gone are the good old days when police warned parents of the miscreants slipping razor blades into apples and Snickers bars during Halloween. Last week, Orange County, Florida Sheriff Jerry Demings alerted the public of the newest threat to costumed children. Marijuana laced “edibles” are the latest threat to our nation’s trick-or-treating children, despite no evidence such a practice exists now or has ever existed.

“We are certainly concerned about trick-or-treating this year as well,” Demings said. “Even though the potential for the marijuana edibles appearing this year may be somewhat minimal, it is still a threat in our community.”

Why is it a threat to Orange County’s children? If you expected Sheriff Demmings to articulate specific examples or reasonable areas where a parent might worry, then welcome to Fault Lines. It’s good to see you here. As it turns out, Sheriff Demings’ concerns aren’t really about the children. It’s about an issue on which Floridians will vote in November, well after Halloween ends. That issue is Florida’s approval for medicinal cannabis use which includes consumption of products that derive from and contain CBD Oil, which have flooded the online marketplace in recent times, like these cbd gummies and edibles, as an example.

Demings, president of the Florida Sheriffs Association, warned [children could get pot cookies] if Florida voters in November pass Amendment 2, which would legalize medical marijuana…Amendment 2 would make it legal for state-approved doctors to prescribe medical marijuana to patients with debilitating diseases such as cancer, ALS – also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease – and Parkinson’s disease…Even though the amendment won’t be voted on until Nov. 8 – after Halloween – the threat is still there, Demings said. He could not offer examples of children receiving laced Halloween candy in states where medical marijuana is legal. (Emphasis added.)

Sheriff Demings, appearing on behalf of a group called “Don’t Let Florida Go To Pot,” put on a show with local children, attempting to influence Florida voters’ decisions on whether medical marijuana would become legal after Halloween. Demings could offer no proof medical marijuana posed a threat to children. He had no examples where pot cookies and gummy bears adversely affected children in states where marijuana was legal for recreational or medical use. His sole recourse was naming edible marijuana products to create a “scare” for “responsible parents.”

The group said people in other states are putting edible marijuana in packages that look appealing to children and calling it names similar to legitimate products – “Pot Tarts” instead of Pop Tarts, or “Nugella” instead of Nutella.

“It looks like any other candy,” Demings said. “Sometimes there’s just mean-spirited people who infuse these type of products into our society to create confusion and injure our children and other people.”

Osceola County Sheriff Bob Hansell also said the packaging was disturbing.

“Who else are they advertising for other than people who like to eat a lot of candy? And who eats a lot of candy? Children,” Hansell said at the news conference.

Keep in mind neither Sheriff Demings nor Hansell could offer a single instance where a child was harmed as a result of receiving a marijuana edible as a Halloween treat. Their only evidence of this new alleged “scare” was a conflation between products marketed to adults using cannabis for medical or recreational purposes and mean-spirited “parents” wanting to get your children high on All Hallow’s Eve. The press conference about the bad people giving your children pot was nothing more than a series of scare tactics motivated by an anti-marijuana political group. Why would people like old 27 wellness sell these kinds of products to a market who can’t partake of them, or could not afford them? Plenty of adults enjoy candies, and many others who need marihuana for medical reasons can’t smoke. So, what’s the issue?

The next question is whether Sheriff Demings or Hansell will face repercussions as a result of their PR stunt blaming the devil marihuana as the latest Halloween scourge. In this case, Garcetti v. Ceballos would likely apply, as both appeared in their official law enforcement capacities, on behalf of a group targeting a political initiative bringing medical marijuana to Florida. However, one would be hard pressed to find an individual who has standing to sue either, or bring a claim for violation of rights, since as of this post no one was harmed by the expression of Sheriff Demings’ and Hansell’s paid for political expressions of speech. Without injury, it’s hard to determine where fault lies.

The lesson to take away from Florida and the elaborate stunt coordinated by two Sheriffs and an anti-marijuana group is a simple one, albeit disturbing. As long as there are people who want to oppose decriminalization of a drug, there will be people ready and willing to “weaponize,” or use as ammunition, children, in furtherance of their goals. Just like with the hoax of razor blades in Halloween candy, it is the job of the parent to determine what candy their children ingest on Halloween and what could potentially be dangerous. Common sense helps. After all, if someone went through the trouble of obtaining some alberta weed online, why would they simply give it away? It doesn’t really make sense.

At the same time, responsibility lies with parents to determine what is a real threat to their children and what is a hoax perpetuated by bogeymen ready to take away parents’ lives, liberty, and property to further any agenda. In a world where “worst-first” thinking is commonplace among parents, that may be the scariest Halloween story of them all.

5 Comments on this post.

Leave a Reply



Comments for Fault Lines posts are closed here. You can leave comments for this post at the new site, faultlines.us

  • Jim Shepherd
    1 November 2016 at 9:03 am - Reply

    There was an article this morning in the Tallahassee Democrat about robocalls made in the middle of the night on Sunday spreading the same FUD talking points about kids and pot candy if Amendment 2 is passed. The group responsible, “Vote No on 2”, apologized for “the inconvenience” but if this is this really the strongest argument they can muster it looks like a losing argument to me.

  • bacchys
    1 November 2016 at 8:14 pm - Reply

    There are, sadly, a lot of stupid, ill-informed people to whome this is going to seem to be a strong argument against ending marijuana prohibition.

  • M. Kase
    1 November 2016 at 8:52 pm - Reply

    Edibles aren’t cheap, and I’d imagine that they would be even more expensive in States where they were illegal. I’d be much more afraid of passing out delicious rum infused chocolate or nicotine gum instead.

  • The War On Thanksgiving
    4 November 2016 at 9:18 am - Reply

    […] 4, 2016 (Fault Lines) — Now that Halloween is over, and the dreaded pot-laced candy is safely stored away from children, it’s time to discuss the real problems facing America. […]

  • Fault Lines Friday Fail
    11 November 2016 at 11:38 am - Reply

    […] failure, as brought to you by Fault Lines contributors. Last week’s “winners” were a pair of Florida Sheriffs who used kids to scare parents over pot laced Halloween candy. Check out this week’s top 5 fails […]