Mimesis Law
27 May 2020

How The DEA Blows Big Pharma’s Role In The Opioid Epidemic

October 25, 2016 (Fault Lines) – Unless you live under a rock, you know there is a growing epidemic of opiate abuse. Heroin is back with a vengeance, in large part because of the growing prescription painkiller market. The trip from taking a few extra pills to shooting up in a back alley smack house starts in the friendly confines of your local doctor’s office and typically ends in the morgue.

And we’ve all seen on the news the impact that opioids are having on our society. There are so many variations of opioids out there, including the very strong, semi-synthetic opioid oxycontin, which is highly addictive. We are watching many in society fall into the trap of addiction to these painkillers, and unlike those who take illegal recreational drugs, they may feel helpless as to where help can be found. Desperate people aren’t able to seek help because they don’t know where to go and if they do try to reach out for help from people they know, they never get the treatment they need. Thankfully, with the growing epidemic also comes a growing number of companies whose aim is to help those in need. For example, some are offering easy access to suboxone care which can help fight opioid addiction. This is online services, which some opioid addicts may prefer, but others would like face-to-face contact to feel more of a sense of compassion and understanding. This is where Clean & Sober Recover Services come in, which again, is an effective way to treat addiction. But why did it get this way? Who is responsible for this? Turns out there are a number of people to blame, and some not so usual suspects.

To start with, people just want to get high. Doctors are careless with their prescriptions. But people are in pain, and that sucks. And doctors have to work a whole lot harder and faster today to make a buck, which also sucks. So if we look past people wanting to get high, and doctors trying to make a living, who is left out there to blame for the painkiller mess?

All these drugs have to come from somewhere. The Drug Enforcement Administration and the pharmaceutical companies are ultimately responsible for how much dope controlled substance is manufactured in America. The companies apply for manufacturing amounts and the DEA approves those amounts. Seems reasonable.

Except, the amount of painkillers the DEA is allowing has grown at an alarming rate. John Temple, author of a book about the Florida pill-mill industry, explains the numbers:

In 1993, the DEA allowed pharmaceutical companies to manufacture 3,520 kilograms of oxycodone. In 2015, the DEA authorized production of 137,500 kilograms of oxycodone. That’s a 39-fold increase in 22 years, the equivalent of turning two Buicks into four Boeing 737s. Either Americans are in 39 times more pain than we were 20 years ago, or something else is wrong.

That startling increase should be a pretty easy trail for the DEA to follow. If it’s going to enforce the administration of drugs, seems like going straight to the source is a good starting point. Cartels are the target in the regular War on Drugs, right? But this is America, and business is business. Turns out drug organizations that use corporate lawyers and accountants instead of guns and smugglers get treated a whole lot differently.

A recent Washington Post article on the DEA’s role in the opioid epidemic explains how drug companies have managed to bear little of the cost of that epidemic.

A decade ago, the Drug ­Enforcement Administration launched an aggressive campaign to curb a rising opioid epidemic that was claiming thousands of American lives each year. The DEA began to target wholesale companies that distributed hundreds of millions of highly addictive pills to the corrupt pharmacies and pill mills that illegally sold the drugs for street use.

That makes sense. Go after the source. The addicts and the doctors are probably a drop in the bucket. So figure out why there are too many pills on the market, choke down the supply to reasonable levels, and problem solved at least addressed. But that was not to be, as often happens when Big Government and Big Business hop into bed together.

But the industry fought back. Former DEA and Justice Department officials hired by drug companies began pressing for a softer approach. In early 2012, the deputy attorney general summoned the DEA’s diversion chief to an unusual meeting over a case against two major drug companies.

“That meeting was to chastise me for going after industry, and that’s all that meeting was about,” recalled Joseph T. Rannazzisi, who ran the diversion office for a decade before he was removed from his position and retired in 2015.

“Fighting” is an interesting way to phrase that. Big Pharma convinced a high-level federal prosecutor to call off an agent. That’s not really fighting. It’s something. It starts with an “f”. But it’s definitely not fighting.

Rannazzisi wasn’t scared off by the meeting and continued the hunt. Of course, he learned that when your boss doesn’t want you to do something, there are a whole lot of ways to make you stop. Rannazzisi’s primary method of combating prescription drug abuse was civil actions against pill wholesalers playing fast and loose with supply rules. There’s an easy way to stop that.

“Things came to a grinding halt,” said Frank Younker, a DEA supervisor in the Cincinnati field office who retired in 2014 after 30 years with the agency. “I talked to my fellow supervisors, and we were all frustrated. It was ridiculous. I don’t know how many lives could have been saved if the process was done quicker.”

The slowdown began in 2013 after DEA lawyers started requiring a higher standard of proof before cases could move forward.

Unlike some street drug you can grow in the backyard or concoct in your basement lab, painkillers are actually manufactured by legitimate pharmaceutical companies. They are spread around the country by distributors. Distributors to whom no one has been paying the slightest bit of attention.

For years, the DEA had taken a hands-off approach to the prescription drugs flowing out of the distributors. The companies had been reporting their drug sales inconsistently or not at all. They had been largely left alone as the DEA focused on doctors and pharmacies.

“The distributors had been ignored for years and years and years,” John J. Coleman, the third-ranking administrator at the DEA in the mid-1990s, said in a recent interview.

Maybe these are just innocent businesses. What do companies like Cardinal Health care about painkiller abuse? Somebody else’s problem, right? How on earth could Cardinal be expected to know its pills were not being used for legitimate medical purposes?

Rannazzisi’s office obtained an internal Cardinal email from 2010 showing that the company’s own investigator had warned against selling narcotics to Gulf Coast Medical Pharmacy, an independent drugstore in Fort Myers, Fla., citing suspicions that the pills were winding up on the street.

Despite the warning, Cardinal hadn’t notified the DEA or cut off the supply of drugs.

Instead, the company shipped increasing quantities of pain pills to Gulf Coast. In 2011 alone, Cardinal sent more than 2 million doses of oxycodone to Gulf Coast. The wholesaler typically shipped 65,000 doses annually to comparable pharmacies.

Oh. Well, yeah. That might be a red flag. If you give a damn about the addiction problem you are fueling with 30 times the normal amount of the most powerful painkiller in the world. But this is a $10 billion business, so things are handled a little differently.

Money quickly shut down the investigation into Cardinal. Not dirty forfeitable cash money. Real money. Pharmaceutical money.

Rannazzisi said [high-ranking Justice Department official] Dinan told him: “We’re getting calls from attorneys, former Justice people, that are saying you guys are doing some enforcement action.”

Not just any attorneys. The kind that get shit done.

Among the attorneys representing Cardinal at the time were two former deputy attorneys general, Jamie S. Gorelick, who served in the Clinton administration, and Craig S. Morford, who served in the George W. Bush administration. Both contacted the DEA, records show.

Did they get shit done? Well, yeah. Of course. That was back around 2012. It’s now 2016, but the company hasn’t even been fined.

In the last several years, the situation at DEA doesn’t seem to have improved, as higher-ups continue to block efforts to rein in the pharmaceutical industry. After a clash with Congress, Rannazzisi was removed from his job. The dispute came to a head after he criticized a law that treated drug distributors favorably. A law that was, in part, the result of $13 million in lobbying efforts.

From a pure law enforcement standpoint, the drug problem in America consists of street drugs and prescription drugs. The source of those drugs are overseas cartels and the pharmaceutical industry. One of those runs a billion-dollar industry, thumbs its nose at regulation, buys off politicians, and generally doesn’t give a damn about the harm its drugs cause. The other one is a cartel.

11 Comments on this post.

Leave a Reply



Comments for Fault Lines posts are closed here. You can leave comments for this post at the new site, faultlines.us

  • dm
    26 October 2016 at 4:35 am - Reply

    As harmful as the alleged “epidemic” of opioid abuse might be, I just cannot help but be amused at the thought of officious little DEA goons getting their wings clipped.

  • Dick Taylor
    26 October 2016 at 5:48 am - Reply

    I’ve been dealing with addicts since medical school, now more than a couple of decades ago. The substances change, but the problem doesn’t seem to.

    Big Pharma doesn’t give much of a shit about addicts. Neither does the DEA. Or the Washington Post, actually. They’ve all got bigger fish to fry.

    It’s probably good to be angry about it, though. Passes the time, anyway.

  • Bill Thomas
    26 October 2016 at 6:58 am - Reply

    A decent article, except you failed to mention how the DEA has forced big pharma into lowering apap amount in painkillers, over the past few years, which will most likely lead to an increase in overdoses and deaths.

    1/3 reduction last year and another 1/4 reduction this year, means that you are not even getting half of the opiates in your system that you were 2 years ago by the same single pill.

    Sure this doesn’t bode well for addicts and such but what about the people who need them for illness and pain? The DEA needs to back off on any foray into policy making and only do what their bosses, members of Congress, tell them. They are only creating bigger and more epic problems…

    • Dick Taylor
      26 October 2016 at 10:50 am - Reply

      Huh? That was the FDA, actually, and it was about trying to prevent liver damage due to acetaminophen toxicity, primarily in alcoholics and the elderly. The DEA doesn’t regulate acetaminophen (also known as APAP), and the FDA action had nothing to do with the quantity of any opiate in any medication.

  • Windypundit
    26 October 2016 at 11:18 am - Reply

    “The companies apply for manufacturing amounts and the DEA approves those amounts. Seems reasonable.”

    No, it doesn’t. It’s not reasonable at all. Opiate use is a decision between doctors and patients. Hundreds of millions of patients. There’s no way some DEA bureaucrats could possibly know how much will be needed by all of them.

    And believing you can cut down on abuse by cutting down on the number of pills produced is shoddy thinking. It’s like believing that 38,000 fatal auto accidents a year are the result of there being too many cars, and that if you just cut auto production by, say, 50,000 vehicles, you could eliminate fatal auto accidents. If you cut pill production, somebody will not get pills, but how do you make sure it’s the abusers who are deprived and not people in desperate need of pain meds?

    • John
      27 October 2016 at 11:22 am - Reply

      If a pharmacy is selling 30 times more opioids than pharmacies of comparable size in comparable markets, I think it is fair to demand a justification or cut off the supply.

      • questioner
        27 October 2016 at 11:56 am - Reply

        Many pharmacies are often located within retail spaces that contain multiple DOCTOR’S offices and HEALTH CLINICS. If there are many doctors in the area, then it’s safe to assume that those patients will go to the conveniently located pharmacy right next door, or near their doctor’s office. As compared to a pharmacy located closer to a residential area, where there are NO health clinics or doctor’s offices. It would be like comparing apples to oranges. There are some areas that have several pain/orthopedic/surgical offices located in the same area and a pharmacy about a block away. So of course most of the traffic of those patients will flow to that pharmacy. Why should they go to another? patients are consumers and are free to choose where they want to spend their consumer dollars. To cut off supply arbitrarily shows a lack of understand of the problem, and lack of understand how to tackle the problem. The problem is not supply side prescribed medicines, it is street side illegal drugs. No matter what any agency does, there will always be a black market. Harming patients will do nothing to curb abuse , addiction, heroin use, nothing.

  • James Dobbin
    26 October 2016 at 12:31 pm - Reply

    This is one of those catch 22 deals.
    I happen to go to a pain management
    Dr. An because of all the regulations
    The regular patient has to jump though hoops, as well as the Dr. As u said …the corporate mogals make their 💰 an people die. An the government is the one who started all of this shit, an the they lobby for the companys an tell the dea to back off.
    Again catch 22 an u can’t get around it. So people will continue too die as the companies survive. 🎱🎱😈

  • Peggyjohio
    26 October 2016 at 12:57 pm - Reply

    At a recent visit to my pain doctor, for fibromyalgia we discussed the problem we had of getting the insurance company to cover lyrica. The doctor said he fights with them constantly. He said they would rather he prescribe opioids than the more expensive meds that work very well, like Lyrica. Another culprit?

  • Bill Thomas
    27 October 2016 at 12:57 pm - Reply

    Pharmacies only sell what doctors prescribe. Doctors spend many years studying and practicing medicine, so what gives bureaucratic agencies the right to monitor and layout ground rules? I don’t see this being done with alcohol and I guarantee you that there are a lot more alcoholics than drug abusers in this Country…

  • Heroin Hysteria Punctures Criminal Justice Reform
    21 February 2017 at 9:05 am - Reply

    […] Oxycontin, Oxycodone, or other opioid pain medication in substantial amounts. Physicians were assured by Big Pharma these new formulations wouldn’t be addictive and would serve their patients with chronic pain […]