Mimesis Law
2 July 2020

Lakeview Cops Offer Citizens Gift Certificates, Lawsuit Opportunities

Dec. 22, 2015 (Mimesis Law) — Everyone has experienced it. The flash of blue strobes behind you. Your hands tightening on the wheel when you see an officer behind you. Now you go through a checklist of things you may have done wrong. Were you speeding? Is your tag expired? Is there something you could be arrested for?

Or maybe, in fact, you’ve done nothing wrong at all:

“They’re going the speed limit and both of them are wearing their seat belts,” Hotchkiss noted as the car cruised serenely by his SUV. “That looks like a good one to pull over.”

Yes, Lakeview, Texas has embarked on a brilliant new program, according to The Baxter Bulletin:

“We are conducting a ‘Doing it Right Safe Driving Campaign. We look for people wearing their seat belts, obeying the speed limit and all the traffic laws,” Hotchkiss told them. “You were doing the right thing so we want to give you this Starbucks gift certificate.”

As one lucky recipient noted:

“I was surprised because I thought I was going the speed limit,” Cindy Davenport said of the traffic stop, laughing. “It’s a nice thought, but it was a little unnerving when you first get pulled over.”

You can certainly understand Ms. Davenport’s nervousness. She has no idea why she’s being pulled over. She could get a ticket, and have to miss a day of work going to court because her tail light was out. Or she could get arrested, and be held up to 48 hours before anyone even figures out if she’s done something wrong. Or she could end up, due to some misunderstanding, getting tased, pepper-sprayed, or shot.

These are all reasonable fears in a country where police officers are constitutionally entitled to arrest you for not wearing a seat belt, or any other minor offense.

What the officers in Lakeview seem to misunderstand is that they are taking a very special privilege we give them, the monopoly on force, and they are using it for what are essentially, very straightforward pranks.

See, you thought you were in serious trouble and were going to have your day ruined. But it turns out, the police officers were just bored. Then, they take the nervous relief on your face as a sign that everything is going according to plan.

It’s pretty clear that nobody at Lakeview thought this through:

“When the chief came to me with this idea, I thought it sounded great,” [the Mayor] said. “I sent an email to the council members asking if anyone had a problem with it and I never heard anything back negative so we went ahead.”

Let’s set aside for the moment that we generally pay for the police in the hope that they will make the area safer by preventing and solving crimes, not for the purpose of gift-card related hijinks.

What happens if the officer pulls you over to give you a gift certificate, and “smells the faint odor of an alcoholic beverage,” or “the overwhelming odor of marijuana.” Is he going to let you go on your way simply because he never had a valid reason to stop you?

Or, what happens if a motorist is a little bit rude? If the officer gives a gift certificate recipient a “lawful order” to put out her cigarette, is it still a crime in his eyes to say no?

However many chai lattés that gift certificate might buy you, it’s probably not worth the risk that the officer might find a whole new reason to detain you once you’re pulled over. Also, and this may come as a surprise to some readers, but the Supreme Court has never gotten around to granting a gift certificate exception to the 4th Amendment. The officer’s motive to stop you is irrelevant. All that matters is whether he had a good reason, which means that he had some reason to think you were committing a crime or posed a risk to the public.

Observing someone not committing a crime, it turns out, is not reasonable articulable suspicion that they are committing a crime.

So each of these gift certificates comes wrapped up neatly with a little constitutional violation and a potential lawsuit. And even though the intrusion might be minor, the Supreme Court held this year that the 4th Amendment does not contain a “no big deal” exception.

It’s quite possible that no one will decide to sue. The officer’s hearts are in the right place, they just don’t quite understand the way that their monopoly on force can make even the most lighthearted encounters coercive.

To the officers of Lakeview, if you want positive publicity, make good arrests. Perform good searches. In your off-time, work for charity.

But when the time comes to give local residents a gift, you don’t have to consult their wish list. Just leave them the hell alone.

18 Comments on this post.

Leave a Reply



Comments for Fault Lines posts are closed here. You can leave comments for this post at the new site, faultlines.us

  • Andrew Fleischman
    22 December 2015 at 11:58 am - Reply
  • Windypundit
    22 December 2015 at 12:03 pm - Reply

    And if another motorist crashes into the stopped vehicles, good luck explaining what was going on to the judge, the city’s liability carrier, and possibly the widows.

  • Richard G. Kopf
    22 December 2015 at 12:53 pm - Reply


    Oh, please! Give the cops a break. With respect, this is the type of bullshit bitching about cops that makes me puke.

    Advice to motorist: Please bring a civil rights lawsuit in federal court alleging that the cops violated your fucking Fourth Amendment rights by stopping you to say “thank you” and by handing you a gift certificate.

    Even though I am hot, truly I wish you all the best.


    • shg
      22 December 2015 at 12:59 pm - Reply

      You might feel differently, Judge, if the guy they stop to show some love has a gun, no idea why he’s been stopped, and kills a cop. Stopping people shouldn’t be a game. Not for the person stopped. Not for the cop. Bad things can happen for everyone involved. Let’s show people appreciation by leaving them alone, and everyone can go home and eat their Christmas goose.

      • Richard G. Kopf
        22 December 2015 at 1:10 pm - Reply


        I never eat goose ever. Indeed, I frequently say: Fuck Foie gras.

        The last sentence above is not entirely true. When I am around PETA people I enjoy speaking reverently of the exquisite taste of a goose that has been through the gavage feeding process. It makes for great holiday dinner conversations.

        All the best.


        • shg
          22 December 2015 at 1:31 pm - Reply

          I’m a big fan of foie gras. Starbucks, not so much.

    • Andrew Fleischman
      22 December 2015 at 1:05 pm - Reply

      The power to detain people is a pretty awesome responsibility. Using that power to do something nice is great, in theory, but it’s not the intended use of that power.

      Also, even leaving aside the constitutional implications, it’s just not a very good way to persuade people that your department is doing a good job.

      IF you want people to love and appreciate you, you hire guys like this:


      • Richard G. Kopf
        22 December 2015 at 1:12 pm - Reply


        Got me with the “go fund me” site. Ouch!

        All the best.


        PS I am back on my meds.

    • Greg Prickett
      22 December 2015 at 7:00 pm - Reply


      With all due respect, the law is crystal clear on this, the police are not entitled to use their powers to stop or detain someone unless they have reasonable suspicion of a crime.

      They don’t get to search your house because you have the best lawn in the neighborhood, nor do they get to restrict your freedom by detaining you for obeying the law.

      I have all the respect in the world for the police, but they are in the wrong here.


      • shg
        23 December 2015 at 8:59 am - Reply

        “With all due respect”? Ouch.

  • Skink
    22 December 2015 at 1:15 pm - Reply

    A prime example of over-analyzing. Not everything presents constitutional questions. As my psychiatrist often tells me, sometimes, it really is just a cigar.

    • Jeff Gamso
      22 December 2015 at 1:54 pm - Reply

      Your psychologist thinks the Constitution is a cigar?

      I thought it was a cigar that’s sometimes a cigar? Which forces me to ask (showing my age), Should a gentleman offer a Tiparillo to a lady?

      • Skink
        22 December 2015 at 3:59 pm - Reply

        Freud–sometimes a cigar really is just a cigar. Corollary–sometimes a gesture is just that.

        As for tiparillos and women: remember, once you start offering, all you get is demands.

  • Eva
    22 December 2015 at 3:07 pm - Reply

    How about instead of stopping a vehicle and making it’s passengers feel potentially threatened just sent them the coupon in the mail with a thank you for being a good citizen thing? How hard would that be?

    You could work out a photo op of the police officer and the people who received those coupons for good publicity if everybody involved agrees to it.

  • Ken Womble
    23 December 2015 at 11:33 am - Reply

    This is one of my favorite comment sections. Thank you to all who participated. As a symbol of my gratitude, you will all have Blockbuster gift cards delivered to you by your local warrant squads.

  • Eva
    23 December 2015 at 7:30 pm - Reply

    So what happens if you step on the gas and try to get away during these kind of interludes?

    Do you still get the starbucks coupon?

    • Jeff Gamso
      23 December 2015 at 8:52 pm - Reply

      They put it in the coffin.

      • Eva
        24 December 2015 at 12:40 pm - Reply

        So maybe they can give it to my relatives because I’ve requested to be cremated….