Mimesis Law
27 May 2022

The Wrong View on Speeding

Feb. 3, 2016 (Mimesis Law) — Almost 20 percent of Virginia’s car accidents in 2018 were speed-related says Richmond Car Accident Lawyers at Phelan Petty. Each year, an average of over 25 people per day die because of speeding. Speed cameras are set up, speeding tickets are given out, and, in extreme cases, licenses are taken away to help reduce the number of speeding. So, it’s quite shocking when police go speeding past us without their lights on. With this being said, trying to police the police yourself, with no legal experience probably isn’t the best idea. And trying to pull over a speeding cop is a terrible idea. Claudia Castillo is a very lucky woman, though:

Castillo, who spoke with Miami Herald news partner CBS 4, said she was running an errand when she spotted Fonticiella racing past her with his siren turned off.

“I think this merits some attention at a countywide level,” Castillo said. “Police officers speed all the time. That should not be an acceptable modus operandi. That’s not the way it works. That’s not the way it should work.”

She happened to stop a very laid-back cop who handled the situation quite well. It looks like he might get in some trouble, however:

The Miami-Dade police officer pulled over by a civilian for allegedly speeding, the scene captured on video that has now gone viral, was identified Monday as Daniel Fonticiella, a former Hammocks District officer who now works at PortMiami.

Police released little other information on Fonticiella – like his age or years of service with the department – except to say that an internal affairs investigation is under way after a complaint was filed Monday by a woman named Claudia Castillo.

We as a society should be embarrassed that anyone cares about this at all.

Video one of three. Video two here, and three here.

Castillo broke the same traffic laws that led her to waste the cop’s time. She can’t exactly catch someone who’s speeding without speeding herself. Plus, her car probably wasn’t as well equipped or maintained as a police cruiser. She’s probably had no special training to help her drive at a high rate of speed. She’s certainly had no training in stopping people. Another problem arising for this is that she will be getting speeding points herself from trying to prevent speeding… it’s a lot to take in. Because of this, her insurance will shoot up, potentially causing her to not be able to afford her new policy. She will have to look at getting car insurance with speeding points from companies such as One Sure Insurance to see how they can help her. It’s evident she thought she was helping but in doing so, she’s caused issues for herself.

Furthermore, she was a distracted driver who focused not on safely getting to her destination but on distracting another motorist to then nag him about doing the same thing she just did to catch him. It was a dangerous situation all around, and her decision was probably worse than the harm she was trying to address. That’s true almost every time anyone makes a traffic stop for a violation, though, cop or not.

It would have been far more dangerous had the cop not been so nice. A lot of cops would’ve yelled at her for wasting their time. A lot would’ve given her a ticket for speeding herself. There are also some that would’ve taken her camera or phone, roughed her up, or worse. She comes off as an insufferable scold. Basically, she comes off just as complacent and hypocritical as cops making traffic stops generally do. He comes off as even-tempered.

As pleasant as he is, the cop still isn’t exactly the model person being stopped. He denies speeding. He clearly tries to adjust the dynamic to be in control. It’s all about power, and whether he did it intentionally or not, he shifted the balance. When he told her he thought she was in distress and tried to make sure she was okay, it was a pretty effective way to regain control of the situation, and one that might make some people in her situation feel a little guilty at that.

The police apologists offered exactly the sort of response any rational person would expect from them:

PBA president John Rivera said Monday he saw “no evidence” that Fonticiella was speeding.

“However, if it were true, two wrongs don’t make a right,” he said. “Had something gone wrong, as in she got into a crash and hurt someone, she would be totally liable. The appropriate action would have been to write the car number down and contact the department. I felt the officer’s response was totally professional and he even offers up his name and badge. I commend him for his demeanor.”

It would be interesting to get Rivera’s take on whether he’s also opposed to cops who break traffic laws messing with people who might’ve broken traffic laws. His response would probably involve a lot of emphasis on the training officers receive, their important role in the community, and so on. As reasonable as that position may be in some respects, it would instantly fall apart if Castillo was also well trained and doing something very important.

Cops who do illegal things for which they’ve received even the tiniest bit of training love to tout that training. When faced with a citizen with the same training or better, they reveal their true colors. Castillo could’ve been Danica Patrick in the world’s safest car, with perfect weather conditions, an ideal road surface, and not another motorist in sight. Rivera would’ve criticized what she did as wrong.

A cop, on the other hand, could spin out turning around in heavy rush hour, halting traffic and endangering everyone around, and then go twice as fast as the speeder he was trying to catch. Rivera wouldn’t mention two wrongs not making a right, liability, or better approaches to the same situation at all.

A cop getting stopped by a citizen makes for a cute story. It makes it seem like we don’t have a ridiculously militarized police force that nitpicks ordinary citizens to death for breaking rules it can’t be troubled to follow itself.

Everyone speeds. Those rare people who don’t tend to fall in the “dangerously slow” category, completely unaware of their much faster surroundings and doing all sorts of reckless things, just at a glacial pace.

Getting excited about the public treating cops the way they treat us only shows how deeply flawed our worldview is. We should be reconsidering the bad decisions that have enabled cops to become reckless disciplinarians rather than celebrating someone who happened to be lucky enough to get away with it too.

2 Comments on this post.

Leave a Reply



Comments for Fault Lines posts are closed here. You can leave comments for this post at the new site, faultlines.us

  • LawDog
    3 February 2016 at 9:32 am - Reply

    Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself.

    Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 485 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).

  • Then Versus Now | Tempe Criminal Defense
    3 February 2016 at 12:19 pm - Reply

    […] post this morning at Fault Lines is about cops speeding. Someone who goes by LawDog put up this quote as […]